(no title)
choeger | 3 months ago
Is there a rich caste of doctors or pharmaceutical shareholders that don't need to work and live off these dividends? Or is the system so inefficient that most people in it aren't contributing to actual health care?
choeger | 3 months ago
Is there a rich caste of doctors or pharmaceutical shareholders that don't need to work and live off these dividends? Or is the system so inefficient that most people in it aren't contributing to actual health care?
nradov|3 months ago
https://peterattiamd.com/saumsutaria/
dboreham|3 months ago
jjav|3 months ago
Nearly all of it goes to grifters who hang on to the system but don't contribute anything. The obvious ones are all the insurance company employees who don't provide any healthcare, just push paperwork to try to find ways to deny coverage. And all the oberpaid administrators, and of course those multi-million bonuses to all executives involved need to be paid somehow.
If that sounds overly cynical, consider a primary care doctor visit. I get about 15 minutes of the time of a nurse assistant (some searching suggests average wage 50K) and 12 minutes with the doctor (searching suggests average wage of 250K).
So the cost of salaries to the people that actually provided me healthcare that day, is $6 + $24 = $30. Even if we double the salaries of both nurse and doctor, it'd be a $60 visit.
Of course, there's office overhead like rent, utilities, etc.
But I get billed $500 for that visit. SO where is all that money going? Obviously not to the health care professionals.
If we simply removed all the grifters from the system, health care would be quite affordable.
choeger|3 months ago
That does not match your earlier statement about administrators or health insurance, though. Or does your primary care doctor work in a big hospital that takes a 400% margin?
silexia|3 months ago
seinvak|3 months ago
simianwords|3 months ago