[utucuro]

It is not a lie though. WB content is not globally available, Netflix content is. I for one, welcome access to stuff that WB has been sitting on without letting me pay them for it.

[gabrielgio]

It is a lie. You are holding on a possible short time gain while ignoring history proven long-term harm of reduced competition, which will lead to higher prices, less innovation, and fewer choices for consumers.

USA anti-trust process is a joke, it is shame that so many company with global footprint relies on that.

[embedding-shape]

> WB content is not globally available, Netflix content is.

Neither are "globally available" as "globally" includes countries that are currently under US embargo, and both those companies are US companies who (supposedly) follow US law.

What you're welcoming isn't "I didn't have access before, now I do!" but rather "I could give Company A money to see this, now I can give company B money to see the same!" which I guess you're happy about, but other's obviously see it for what it is, no practical change except for shareholders.

[venturecruelty]

It's like there's an entire continent of rakes and people are the Louis and Clark of stepping on all of them.

[izacus]

You keep posting this without any idea whether Netflix will relicense anything at all or if you're going to get the movies you want.

It's just copium fueled corporate bootlicking at this point.