top | item 46161121

(no title)

magicmicah85 | 2 months ago

Oh sweet, two of my subscriptions now reduced to one. Right?

discuss

order

JKCalhoun|2 months ago

Neutral here: I subscribe to neither.

I found out that there's a backlog of content going back over 100 years (a lot of it at the public library) and have been happily consuming that for about 6 or 7 years now.

(I still have about 4 decades to go to catch up with today—which will probably take me another 3 years or so).

mrweasel|2 months ago

That's my thinking. I get the argument for "reduced competition" but Netflix and HBO aren't competitors. They are just two companies in the same line of business, but with different production lines.

I do wonder what it will do for their sports deals. HBO have had the rights to a lot of sports, including Tour de France and the olympics and is the only way to get EuroSport, as well as a number of TV channels, including some country specific ones.

Rastonbury|2 months ago

You don't see reduced competiton? HBO Max and Netflix are director competitors, post acqusition Netflix no longer had to compete hard with shows like Succession. The expanded catalog makes it even harder for smaller streamers to compete.

On sports rights Netflix no longer has to bid and compete with HBO, and same story having a bigger live sport inventory.

This is not unlike consolidation of food distributors where the end up wielding strong pricing power, farmers have fewer options to sell to and restaurants have few options to buy from. The middleman profits.

But yeah Netflix will probably spin off Cable