Very interesting that Valve and Framework seem to be throwing their eggs in the Arch basket over Debian/Ubuntu. When I got my first computer, I installed Ubuntu because it was dominant. Maybe it still is for the average Linux downloader, but why are the Hardware companies more into Arch?
nrp|2 months ago
ezschemi|2 months ago
snapplebobapple|2 months ago
chironjit|2 months ago
rPlayer6554|2 months ago
tazard|2 months ago
nerdponx|2 months ago
My guess is that Arch is easier to build on top of because they have a stronger culture of leaving packages as unmodified as possible relative to their upstream sources, whereas Debian maintainers seem to have the opposite culture. A Debian system has a lot of Debian-isms in it overall, whereas the Arch-isms tend to be more like generic sensible defaults rather than OS idosyncrasies.
nextaccountic|2 months ago
vitorsr|2 months ago
And over Fedora/RHEL. If I had to guess, it could be that new entrants find it easier to submit changes to Arch Linux packages [1]. ChromeOS also steered away from Debian-based distributions, choosing a Gentoo base.
[1] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages
Bolwin|2 months ago
dingnuts|2 months ago
[deleted]
nickorlow|2 months ago
vitorsr|2 months ago
preisschild|2 months ago
crowcroft|2 months ago
OsrsNeedsf2P|2 months ago
bombcar|2 months ago
Arch (or even Gentoo) is great if you want to do more detailed customizations of various things.
blu3h4t|2 months ago