top | item 46168652 (no title) 7373737373 | 2 months ago minor correction: 2^(NxN) squares per row, right? discuss order hn newest pontifier|2 months ago Yeah, what was I thinking?? I really need to slow down sometimes. This should contain every finite pattern, right? 7373737373|2 months ago Yes, sounds like it! Though I'm thinking that the relative arrangement of patterns would also make a difference. I wonder if such a thing as "all (infinitely many) possible arrangements of all patterns" can exist
pontifier|2 months ago Yeah, what was I thinking?? I really need to slow down sometimes. This should contain every finite pattern, right? 7373737373|2 months ago Yes, sounds like it! Though I'm thinking that the relative arrangement of patterns would also make a difference. I wonder if such a thing as "all (infinitely many) possible arrangements of all patterns" can exist
7373737373|2 months ago Yes, sounds like it! Though I'm thinking that the relative arrangement of patterns would also make a difference. I wonder if such a thing as "all (infinitely many) possible arrangements of all patterns" can exist
pontifier|2 months ago
7373737373|2 months ago