top | item 46169739

(no title)

am17an | 2 months ago

It's bad for consumers period. A deal that hampers 40% of global supply shouldn't be a thing, it's predatory. I know DRAM is not a necessity, but considering that PCs are going to be affected means this affects real things like schools and hospitals. There's being smart while making a deal and there's knee-capping the market with your leveraged to the tits business

discuss

order

behnamoh|2 months ago

but where do we draw the line? Would 39% be okay? and who's gonna draw the line and enforce it?

am17an|2 months ago

I hope this is not a serious argument. This deal is OOM larger than other deals

daemonologist|2 months ago

The line imo is the amount of DRAM OpenAI actually needs/can use. If they end up piling some of it in a warehouse just so nobody else can use it, lock em up.

UltraSane|2 months ago

Do they actually have the cash to buy all of this RAM? If not then it should be very illegal.

testing22321|2 months ago

You’re just talking about putting limits on capitalism. Be careful, that’s blasphemy.