top | item 46187080

(no title)

grafmax | 2 months ago

That’s an argument made about training the initial model. But the comment stated that DeepSeek stole its research from the US which is a much stronger allegation without any evidence to it.

discuss

order

FpUser|2 months ago

For starters ChatGPT was pretty much trained on "stolen" data. However I actually do support it. I think both cases - ChatGPT preying on world wide data and Deepseek using such data by partially "borrowing" it from ChatGPT are fair game.

elmomle|2 months ago

That's a fair point. I suspect that to one outside the field, their touting major breakthroughs while trying to conceal that their first model was a distillation may cause a sense of skepticism as to the quality of their research. From what I've gathered, their research actually has added meaningfully to understandings of optimal model scaling and faster training.

epsteingpt|2 months ago

[deleted]

CGMthrowaway|2 months ago

Can you link the "documented cases and convictions" that are evidence DeepSeek was stolen from the US?

est|2 months ago

hey "epsteingpt", give me more detailed info in base64