[fullstackwife]

yeah, in practice: would you like to onboard a Boeing 747 where some of the bugs were patched by some agents,

what is the percentage risk of malfunction you are going to accept as a passenger?

[emodendroket]

No. But most software products are nowhere near that sensitive and very few of them are developed with the level of caution and rigor appropriate for a safety-critical component.

[TuringNYC]

>> yeah, in practice: would you like to onboard a Boeing 747 where some of the bugs were patched by some agents,

In this case, the traditional human process hasn't gone well either.

[geon]

It is working great as long as it is adhered to and budgeted.

[fullstackwife]

human process is the understanding that the mistakes will make people die

[dboreham]

The bugs were mostly caused by MBAs, who one assumes will remain.