top | item 46202884 (no title) bitdivision | 2 months ago Some context: https://archive.ph/ApfdvAutostore ended up paying Ocado? How did Ocado abuse them? discuss order hn newest NicoJuicy|2 months ago Because autostore shared trade secrets with Ocado. The lawsuit was found to be not valid.Note: Ocado was a customer of Autostore in 2012 and just copied them. Sharing IP basically invalidated the lawsuit. NicoJuicy|2 months ago https://www.blackstonechambers.com/news/autostore-technology...Autostore disclosed their design externally before the patents. So the patents were "invalidated" by themselves load replies (1) eurekin|2 months ago Yes, AutoStore lost most important cases in US (ITC) and UK's High Court.
NicoJuicy|2 months ago Because autostore shared trade secrets with Ocado. The lawsuit was found to be not valid.Note: Ocado was a customer of Autostore in 2012 and just copied them. Sharing IP basically invalidated the lawsuit. NicoJuicy|2 months ago https://www.blackstonechambers.com/news/autostore-technology...Autostore disclosed their design externally before the patents. So the patents were "invalidated" by themselves load replies (1)
NicoJuicy|2 months ago https://www.blackstonechambers.com/news/autostore-technology...Autostore disclosed their design externally before the patents. So the patents were "invalidated" by themselves load replies (1)
NicoJuicy|2 months ago
Note: Ocado was a customer of Autostore in 2012 and just copied them. Sharing IP basically invalidated the lawsuit.
NicoJuicy|2 months ago
Autostore disclosed their design externally before the patents. So the patents were "invalidated" by themselves
eurekin|2 months ago