(no title)
zygentoma | 2 months ago
And also at the same time a good reminder for everyone to find a browser that supports JPEG XL. I wonder if that was part of the reason to do this. :)
zygentoma | 2 months ago
And also at the same time a good reminder for everyone to find a browser that supports JPEG XL. I wonder if that was part of the reason to do this. :)
embedding-shape|2 months ago
That's probably furthest down on my list of features I look for in browser, where the top two are "Not run by a for-profit company living on extracting data from users" and "Can have tabs vertically in sidebar in a tree-based structured format".
MrAlex94|2 months ago
- Supports JXL out of the box (including support for alpha transparency and animations)
- Vertical tabs with optional tree tabs (hired the original tree style tab developer to implement the feature)
- For profit, but I don’t want your data, collect it or use it to earn a living (telemetry/analytics/experiments disabled at build time and alongside a fair few patches on top to make sure external connections are limited to what’s necessary)
Sidebar, I’m the developer of Waterfox
progbits|2 months ago
Chrome and Firefox are making a very reasonable decision to wait for a memory safe decoder.