The core argument is technical. NVIDIA is not Enron, in a criminal way. Enron was cooking the books, while NVIDIA is a legitimate monopoly with a product that is in high demand. And the demand, the author claims, is artificial.
So many words for what is effectively one or two short paragraphs.
bitpush|2 months ago
The core argument is technical. NVIDIA is not Enron, in a criminal way. Enron was cooking the books, while NVIDIA is a legitimate monopoly with a product that is in high demand. And the demand, the author claims, is artificial.
So many words for what is effectively one or two short paragraphs.