top | item 46225930 (no title) amwet | 2 months ago “I want a new font so it’s easier to read” isn’t neutral? discuss order hn newest actionfromafar|2 months ago Not when you are the aggressor in WW2?I guess if Russia invaded Western Europe and Putin decided to switch from Cyrillic to Latin script so the subjugated peoples would more easily read and learn Russian, that would be neutral too? irishcoffee|2 months ago That isn’t a genuine argument.Font face != different language + different alphabet.Font, still a bad argument but technically correct. Font face, nah. load replies (2)
actionfromafar|2 months ago Not when you are the aggressor in WW2?I guess if Russia invaded Western Europe and Putin decided to switch from Cyrillic to Latin script so the subjugated peoples would more easily read and learn Russian, that would be neutral too? irishcoffee|2 months ago That isn’t a genuine argument.Font face != different language + different alphabet.Font, still a bad argument but technically correct. Font face, nah. load replies (2)
irishcoffee|2 months ago That isn’t a genuine argument.Font face != different language + different alphabet.Font, still a bad argument but technically correct. Font face, nah. load replies (2)
actionfromafar|2 months ago
I guess if Russia invaded Western Europe and Putin decided to switch from Cyrillic to Latin script so the subjugated peoples would more easily read and learn Russian, that would be neutral too?
irishcoffee|2 months ago
Font face != different language + different alphabet.
Font, still a bad argument but technically correct. Font face, nah.