You are dating an ecosystem

[Fraterkes]

Sorta disconcerting (to me) the stuff that’s getting to the frontpage of hn lately

[flohrian]

I found this piece somewhat refreshing.

It presents a thought I have not thought about before. Whether, as some other commenters suggest, the hypothesis that you are dating an ecosystem, has always been true is a different question.

[chrystalkey]

This does not seem very well tought out, gives off more of a frustrated teen vibe.

[froidpink]

This post gives off the old "women shouldn't be reading or they'll get ideas" energy

[Arodex]

Again an article painting an idealized picture of the past that never existed.

[soganess]

Yup. And the writing style gives big divorced dad (but with a phil degree) energy... but I think there's something interesting in the rough to poke at.

It's a velocity + availability "no Tom Brokaw" argument as applied to relationships. Like the question it's poking at "if an ecosystem can radicalize a person, what are its effects on a relationship?" is at least interesting to consider.

[komali2]

> The Instagram explore page that shapes her taste. The vocabulary borrowed from her favorite online therapist. Micro-influencers she follows without thinking. The TikTok algorithm that nudges her mood. The attachment style she diagnosed herself with.

> What used to be a disagreement becomes “emotional labor.” A bad mood gets labeled “toxic energy.” Forgetting to text becomes “avoidant attachment.” Opinions from friends, refreshed by the hour.

Smells like the angst of some recently dumped man. The girl is a slave to the whims of tik tok candy therapists but the boy is influenced by "ghosts." Please.

What this post is hitting upon correctly is that people are products of their environment, and trying to perfectly separate the two is impossible.

[tianqi]

This piece struck a chord with me. It captured that feeling so precisely. I can't be more grateful he put it into words for me. I get it.

My wife will notice a change in me tonight. That's because I've taken on another advisor.

[KitN]

But hasn't this always been the case? What is personality if not a weighted summation of the content they consume? Before the feeds and the algorithm it was books and gossips.

[hexbin010]

Right, books and gossip is exactly the same as modern tech and social media. Nothing to see

[superb-owl]

Always has been

[gwd]

"Having lovers and friends is all good and fine, but I don't like yours, and you don't like mine" -- Eric Clapton

[zwnow]

Was just about to write, there is no difference to how dating worked back in the day. Its just more online.

[agumonkey]

The socio-affective impact of unlimited internet seems to, also, be unlimited

[Reubachi]

"People and consciousness are bundles of their own experiences, and cannot be broken down to static systems. more @ 11."

Nothing in this "Article" is based in any fact or input-causality examination that was (before) unclear. Just a person putting esoteric emotional reasoning on a blog.

(And of course, my own comment here breaks HN good-faith commenting rules. But c'mon.)

[ramon156]

Concept is good, but this doesn't seem very thought out, and the AI generated image doesn't help

[andrelaszlo]

"We are highly confident this text was AI generated"

96% AI generated according to gptzero.

Which I wouldn't mind, honestly, if it had something useful, insightful, or original to say.

In a way I'm glad it doesn't seem to be written by a human:

> What used to be a disagreement becomes “emotional labor.”

> A bad mood gets labeled “toxic energy.”

This sounds like someone who dismisses their partner's feelings as fragmented memes, and sees her as almost brain-washed by the algorithm.

It contrasts this against a time where a relationship was something entirely different, where he could know everyone she's interacting with.

> And it doesn’t stop there.

> She has friends.

God forbid...

If this was a person and not an AI, they would sound incredibly controlling. Maybe the "toxicity" and "red flag" ideas didn't form in a vacuum?