[ramity]

Contrasting take: RTT and a service providing black box knowledge is not equivalent to knowledge of the backbone. To assume traffic is always efficiently routed seems dubious when considering a global scale. The supporting infrastructure of telecom is likely shaped by volume/size of traffic and not shortest paths. I'll confess my evaluation here might be overlooking some details. I'm curious on others' thoughts on this.

[seszett]

They don't have to assume that traffic is efficiently routed, on the contrary if they can have a <1ms RTT from London to a server, the speed of light guarantees that that server is not in Mauritius EVEN if the traffic was efficiently routed.

It just can't be outside England, just one 0.4ms RTT as seen here is enough to be certain that the server is less then 120 km away from London (or wherever their probe was, they don't actually say, just the UK).

RTT from a known vantage point gives an absolute maximum distance, and if that maximum distance is too short then that absolutely is enough to ascertain that a server is not in the country it claims to be.

[preinheimer]

We've got detailed global ping data here: https://wondernetwork.com/pings

One of our competitors was claiming a server in a middle eastern country we could not find any hosting in. So I figured out what that server's hostname was to do a little digging. It was >1ms away from my server in Germany.

[ramity]

I see I was mistaken, but I'm tempted to continue poking holes. Trying a different angle, though it may be a stretch, but could a caching layer within the VPN provider cause these sort of "too fast" RTTs?

Let's say you're a global VPN provider and you want to reduce as much traffic as possible. A user accesses the entry point of your service to access a website that's blocked in their country. For the benefit of this thought experiment, let's say the content is static/easily cacheable or because the user is testing multiple times, that dynamic content becomes cached. Could this play into the results presented in this article? Again, I know I'm moving goalposts here, but I'm just trying to be critical of how the author arrived at their conclusion.

[Pyrolol]

The speed of light provides a limit on distance for a given RTT, and taking the examples in the article which are less than 0.5ms and considering the speed of light (300km/ms) the measured exit countries must be accurate.

The speed of light in fiber which probably covers most of the distance is also even slower due to refraction (about 2/3).

[ramity]

Thanks for your informative reply. I see now I was approaching this incorrectly. I was considering drawing conclusions from a high RTT rather than a RTT so small it would be impossible to have gone the distance.

[reincoder]

We (I work for IPinfo) talk about latency because it is a thread that you can start from when exploring our full depth of data.

We are the internet data company and our ProbeNet only represents a fraction of our investment. Through our ProbeNet, we run ping, traceoute, and other active measurements. Even with traceroute we understand global network topology. There are dozens and dozens of hints of data.

We are tapping into every aspect on the internet data possible. We are modeling every piece of data that is out there, and through research, we are coming up with new sources of data. IP geolocation is only product for us. Our business is mapping internet network topology.

We are hoping to work with national telecoms, ISPs, IXPs, and RIRs to partner with them, guiding and advising them about data-driven internet infrastructure mapping.

[IshKebab]

> I'll confess my evaluation here might be overlooking some details.

Yeah like... physics. If you're getting sub-millisecond ping times from London you aren't talking to Mauritius.