She's very hit or miss in her quality IMO. Also, she's explicitly disclaimed the title of "science communicator", so she might not want to be on this list anyway. :)
I kind of wish they hadn't included Veritasium either. He seems to have gone downhill.
Her content is mostly meta, vs science comm/teaching. I am really torn on her: Great communicator, funny, accomplished. Seems confident/smug?/conservative for a scientist. Something about her word choice and style feels more politician than learner/researcher. Not sure how to phrase this.
andrewflnr|2 months ago
I kind of wish they hadn't included Veritasium either. He seems to have gone downhill.
MPSimmons|2 months ago
https://www.electrify.video/post/electrify-completes-majorit...
the__alchemist|2 months ago