top | item 46294575 (no title) r2vcap | 2 months ago This is a serious issue. How is it possible for GitHub/Microsoft to charge me for using my own machine as a self-hosted GitHub Actions runner? discuss order hn newest Bognar|2 months ago They're charging you for orchestration, log storage, artifact storage, continued development of the runner binary itself and features available to self-hosted machines. What would your own machine do without the runner and service it connects to? handfuloflight|2 months ago They still have to manage state between their servers and yours. bdbdbdb|2 months ago I'll be investigating gitlab tomorrow 000ooo000|2 months ago Have used all of the big 4 forges in anger over the last decade. GitLab isn't perfect, but I'd take it over GitHub any day of the week. kavaruka|2 months ago it charges you to use the platform features that enable your use of self-hosted runners naian|2 months ago For the same reason they charge you for running Word, even though you're the one who has to write, I guess?
Bognar|2 months ago They're charging you for orchestration, log storage, artifact storage, continued development of the runner binary itself and features available to self-hosted machines. What would your own machine do without the runner and service it connects to?
bdbdbdb|2 months ago I'll be investigating gitlab tomorrow 000ooo000|2 months ago Have used all of the big 4 forges in anger over the last decade. GitLab isn't perfect, but I'd take it over GitHub any day of the week.
000ooo000|2 months ago Have used all of the big 4 forges in anger over the last decade. GitLab isn't perfect, but I'd take it over GitHub any day of the week.
kavaruka|2 months ago it charges you to use the platform features that enable your use of self-hosted runners
naian|2 months ago For the same reason they charge you for running Word, even though you're the one who has to write, I guess?
Bognar|2 months ago
handfuloflight|2 months ago
bdbdbdb|2 months ago
000ooo000|2 months ago
kavaruka|2 months ago
naian|2 months ago