[tigroferoce]

You can and you should. There are people that are happy to pay for email, for search, for videos, for news, for music. I don't see why there wouldn't be people happy to pay for a browser.

The idea that software is free is completely wrong and should be something that an organization like Mozilla should combat. If software is free, there can be no privacy, it's as simple as that.

[dabockster]

> The idea that software is free is completely wrong

> If software is free, there can be no privacy, it's as simple as that.

Strongly agreed. Free software, either $0 or through stronger licenses like the GPL, have their economics completely shifted as an unintended side effect. Those new economics tend to favor clandestine funding sources (eg ads or malicious supply chain code).

But sustainable funding honestly isn't Mozilla's strong suite (or tech's in general, for that matter).

[palata]

> I don't see why there wouldn't be people happy to pay for a browser.

I admittedly didn't check the numbers, but a comment in a sibling thread says that if Mozilla was to replace their revenue with donations, they would have to become one of the biggest charities in America.

Is that even realistic? Like would they make that kind of money just from donations?