[dcreager]

Yes, we love TypeForm! We plan to support it as soon as the PEP for it lands. Under the covers, we already support much of what's needed, and use it for some of our special-cased functions like `ty_extensions.is_equivalent_to` [1,2]. TypeForm proper has been lower on the priority list mostly because we have a large enough backlog as it is, and that lets us wait to make sure there aren't any last-minute changes to the syntax.

[1] https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/blob/0bd7a94c2732c232cc142...

[2] https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/blob/0bd7a94c2732c232cc142...