top | item 46303291

A16z-backed Doublespeed hacked, revealing what its AI-generated accounts promote

292 points| grahamlee | 2 months ago |404media.co

170 comments

order

boh|2 months ago

AI is pretty much killing social media in the long term. Even pre-AI, a good chunk of posts/comment sections on sites were bots/paid. Reddit is becoming less believable than ChatGPT. I guess there's still the Onion-verse.

cgh|2 months ago

Yes, Dead Internet Theory went from joke to reality in what feels like overnight.

themafia|2 months ago

I'm not convinced you can have an impromptu global conversation to any positive end. Humans are not well suited to this task and an unsupervised mostly anonymous forum plays to those weaknesses and provides no support to generate positive outcomes.

It was never a particularly good idea at the scale it's currently deployed at.

anovikov|2 months ago

This is a good thing. More and more people will stop consuming it, going back to the mainstream media, so will perhaps become more sensible.

riversflow|2 months ago

Reddit died to me when they allowed private profiles this summer.

osn9363739|2 months ago

I thought the same. I'm still 90% of the same mindset. But it does worry me how much people like slop. But is it because it's novel? and will people get tired of it?

barfoure|2 months ago

> Reddit is becoming less believable than ChatGPT.

Hard disagree, and I’ll cite a simple example: Reddit isn’t one community. It’s a hub and spoke model. There are many good communities with curators and SMEs.

My canonical example that’s counter to this is HN. No offense to anyone but Reddit doesn’t have a hive mind - communities do. And HN hive mind is wrong more often than right and has been targeted by all sorts of astroturfers along the way. I personally take very few comments on here seriously, no takes seriously, and mostly show up to read comments by some actual hard cred people (f.e. animats). Everyone else might as well be a shill bot. AI doesn’t change this. I still get cream of the crop from Reddit.

Having said that, social media isn’t dead. It’ll transform. Two things are eternal: 1) women’s need for attention, 2) men’s need to get laid.

ajross|2 months ago

"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind."

Seems like the Butlerian Jihad is arriving ahead of schedule, and the real horrors demanding the uprising aren't oppression and violence, but viral marketing and sockpuppetry.

jaredcwhite|2 months ago

Yeah, but also the violence already started via hacked brains. OpenAI is having to fend off multiple lawsuits because its chatbot users started taking their own lives.

bicepjai|2 months ago

So this is the reality we're living in now, where bot farms have become normalized? I always associated bot farms with authoritarian regimes like Russia and China, but are we becoming the same thing? And VC funds are actually backing this? I hope I'm not the only one who finds this completely insane. I can't even listen to the a16z podcast anymore; my mind now permanently associates them with bot farms. These are the news that makes me think does people ever think about moral values and ethics.

sellmesoap|2 months ago

Gorilla marketing and bot farms have been around for a very long time. There are bot farms to amplify all sorts of messages. A friend who is a 'performance artest' paid almost nothing to have his linked-in account amplified by a large number of nonsense accounts on that platform. 'creators' frequently buy followers so 'the algorythm' will surface their 'content'. My first roommate 20 years ago almost got a job riding the train and having 'organic' conversations about how great some product is. My solution is to buy nothing and poke and laugh at everything. (Edited for spelling)

aomix|2 months ago

I keep believing there’s a web of trust type future for social media but I can’t articulate it.

CamelCaseName|2 months ago

Hack reveals that startup is doing exactly what it said it was doing

Okay, is this just an ad then?

technion|2 months ago

Hilarious - i was literally just telling someone that im seeing no end of ads for vibit, and the dozens of glowing comments looked fake to me.

Noaidi|2 months ago

My god, horrific. Does not everyone know everything online is a psyop now? I will tel you, they don't. No one studies things, no one takes the time. AI, social media, it all has to be protested, boycotted.

Now it seems war is coming from the US it could not be more true that at this moment.

Hizonner|2 months ago

How about a few prison terms for conspiracy to defraud? And not for small fry like the "CEO" of this company either. Why not, say, 10 years for Marc Andreesen, personally? And, no, no "disrupting" it with serve-your-time-as-a-service, either.

nathancahill|2 months ago

> He posted on HN.

The call is coming from inside the house.

hhh|2 months ago

No, we should not stop something that is inevitable. We should work with it to find ways that it fits into a productive society, such as anonymously verifying that you are a citizen so the cost of abuse is at least a felony.

ipython|2 months ago

wow... honestly, reading the Twitter feed for Zuhair ("CEO" of DoubleSpeed) makes me sick. https://x.com/rareZuhair and https://www.zuhair.io/.

If you want more photos of his phone farm... it's all on his twitter page: https://x.com/rareZuhair/status/1961160231322517997

"Accelerating the dead Internet"? Why are we, as a community, encouraging the acceleration of enshitification of our common spaces? So weird to me...

qingcharles|2 months ago

He's doing it for the ragebait, but the sad thing is the product is totally real. Cory was right from the start.

neilv|2 months ago

He sounds like an intelligent but misguided teenager. Maybe he's not a bad kid, and just needs better role models than the companies he mentions.

If we never do things that later make us cringe and want to correct, we're not reflective and self-critical enough.

thephyber|2 months ago

The risky thing about creating this tool is that someone will inevitably use it against the creator, the employees, and the investors.

Noaidi|2 months ago

It is not weird, it is greed and control.

bpt3|2 months ago

WTF happened to a16z?

They used to be at the pinnacle of the VC sector, and now they seem to actively seek out the most toxic portcos possible.

jbhoot|2 months ago

Andreessen's true colours have often flared up. I noticed it when India banned Facebook's Free Basics scheme. He had needlessly, without provocation, lashed out like a child who was denied an ice-cream cone. I will never forget his now-deleted tweet:

> Anti-colonialism has been economically catastrophic for the Indian people for decades. Why stop now?

https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-35542497

camillomiller|2 months ago

Nothing. Egghead has always been an evil villain. He just fooled you all long enough, until he could show his real face without repercussions

drcongo|2 months ago

Really?! They've always made a little bit of sick come up for me. Marc Andreessen has always been a grotesque parody of Lex Luthor.

bflesch|2 months ago

If you read "Careless People" you'll notice that Andreesseen was prioritizing cash over morals for a long time, and his Facebook investment/involvement was also producing highly unethical things

neuroelectron|2 months ago

Once you have infinite money, you tend to want infinite power next

tolerance|2 months ago

Looks like this is a report on how the company just…handles its business: https://doublespeed.ai/

jfindper|2 months ago

>"never pay a human again."

>"Take proven content and spawn variation."

It's almost refreshing how unashamed they are. I hate it, obviously, but I kind of like it better than companies that say something dressed up in marketing speak but actually mean what this site just says outright.

coffeebeqn|2 months ago

Wow I thought this type of business was illegal or at least a very gray area conducted on the dark web but looks like the VCs at this point have no morals left. Gambling? Amazing. Spam? Take my money. Ad fraud? Yes please

ryanjshaw|2 months ago

How does one profit from this farm of AI content on TikTok?

jonas21|2 months ago

Yeah, it's basically free publicity for them.

UncleMeat|2 months ago

Holy crap. They really are leaning into "evil supervillain" advertising copy.

2OEH8eoCRo0|2 months ago

Why isn't this company sued for computer fraud and abuse?

gruez|2 months ago

Because using the CFAA as a cudgel against things you don't like, whether it's journalists exposing insecure government systems, or companies engaging in deceptive marketing practices is a bad idea? For the latter, there's already laws against it that doesn't involve CFAA, eg. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-I/subchapter-B...

Nextgrid|2 months ago

When you're a company with funding and/or a network of benefactors behind it a lot of laws stop applying. And if all else fails, I hear pardons aren't particularly expensive these days.

SilverElfin|2 months ago

This feels not very different from the recent report revealing how Nick Fuentes has a lot of artificial likes and comments on videos that push his content, due to a large following that responds to commands delivered via Telegram etc. A VC backed corporation using a large phone farm to manipulate the public is no better than Nick Fuentes.

jbm|2 months ago

[deleted]

songodongo|2 months ago

[deleted]

bossyTeacher|2 months ago

How long until the company gets sued by X/Meta/Tik Tok?

heroprotagonist|2 months ago

They don't even take down the spam you report. I doubt they'll do anything until their user base declines.

hephaes7us|2 months ago

Bot activity could push up engagement metrics on these platforms, so (in some sense) those companies aren't necessarily incentivized to stop this.

fny|2 months ago

The Internet is dead. Long live the Internet.

queuebert|2 months ago

Let's be honest. It's been mostly downhill since AOL.

grahamlee|2 months ago

As the submitter, I want to point out that I submitted this post with the original title. The one that makes it clear a16z are behind the social media astroturfing. The mods changed the title.

tomhow|2 months ago

That’s fine, you did nothing wrong. I explained the title change here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46307121.

Edit: The community has spoken and I've come up with a way to include a16z in the title whilst keeping it under 80 chars.

1vuio0pswjnm7|2 months ago

Actual title: "Hack Reveals the a16z-Backed Phone Farm Flooding TikTok With AI Influencers"

shagmin|2 months ago

Original title was better in multiple ways. Mods did a disservice here.

gnabgib|2 months ago

Yes.. it was updated to this by mods

1vuio0pswjnm7|2 months ago

Perhaps of interest

There is an 80-character limit on titles

This title is 75 characters

yodon|2 months ago

Streisand effect?

A mod changed the title to something other than the originally submitted original article title, to protect a major VC.

Not cool.

kotaKat|2 months ago

And it’s been shunted to the third page as of 8:20 AM ET the next morning. Really interesting behaviour going on.

nickphx|2 months ago

why was the original title edited to remove the reference to a16z? why hide investment into socially unacceptable product? if you are going to be a scumbag weasel, own it.

tomhow|2 months ago

Edit: Fine! I found a way to get a16z in there and keep it to 80 chars.

Both for length reasons and because it was clickbait.

The original title doesn’t even have the actual company’s name in it, only the name of the investor, which is intended to elicit just the kind of ragey reaction you’re exhibiting in this comment.

On HN, titles need to be more neutral and factual (I.e., include the name of the company the article is primarily about).

(Also, you seem to be implying some conflict of interest? Doublespeed and a16z have nothing to do with HN/YC.)

sp527|2 months ago

> The hacker, who asked for anonymity because he feared retaliation from the company, said he reported the vulnerability to Doublespeed on October 31

Lmao. Nice.

ackfoobar|2 months ago

I checked out one of the accounts mentioned, mostly to check if I can discern fake accounts. The content is just still pictures. I'd dismiss those whether or not they're AI. Well, I'm not on TikTok anyway.

This reminds me of some youtube videos when I was researching some stuff to buy. Those videos are just still images plus text-to-speech narration, usually with an annoying background music.

lawlessone|2 months ago

>Well, I'm not on TikTok anyway.

I'm not on tiktok and the videos often won't play for me because of that.

Are they still images as videos with tts or literally just still images?

mmooss|2 months ago

> mostly to check if I can discern fake accounts

You are making yourself easier to fool: You don't know which fake accounts you overlooked, and by increasing your confidence you make yourself more vulnerable to them in the future.