top | item 46305076 (no title) dakshgupta | 2 months ago We expressly did not conclude that more lines = better. You could easily argue more lines = worse. All we wanted to show is that there are more lines. discuss order hn newest poliphili|2 months ago Language like "productivity gains", "output" and "force multiplier" isn't neutral like you're claiming here, and does imply that the line count metric indicates value being delivered for the business. rsynnott|2 months ago > Lines of code per developer grew from 4,450 to 7,839 as AI coding tools act as a force multiplier.I mean, come on, now. "Force multiplier" is hardly ambiguous.We have known that this is a useless way to measure productivity since before most people on this site were born.
poliphili|2 months ago Language like "productivity gains", "output" and "force multiplier" isn't neutral like you're claiming here, and does imply that the line count metric indicates value being delivered for the business.
rsynnott|2 months ago > Lines of code per developer grew from 4,450 to 7,839 as AI coding tools act as a force multiplier.I mean, come on, now. "Force multiplier" is hardly ambiguous.We have known that this is a useless way to measure productivity since before most people on this site were born.
poliphili|2 months ago
rsynnott|2 months ago
I mean, come on, now. "Force multiplier" is hardly ambiguous.
We have known that this is a useless way to measure productivity since before most people on this site were born.