(no title)
pooper
|
2 months ago
I appreciate the writer actually taking the time to explain why `george`. I have worked in some projects where some thing-a-majing or another is called `valhalla` or `thor` or something or another but there is no documentation as to why it is called that and the people who were responsible for naming them so have already ridden into the sunset. If I ever meet him, I "just want to talk" to this CTO who named US East region 2 as "eu2".
zdragnar|2 months ago
It's better to have arbitrary names that are memorable in some way but not common enough to be associated with someone living within recent memory.
IMHO, YMMV, yada yada
ryandrake|2 months ago
Reminds me of a project I was peripherally involved with many moons ago. The codename for the project was "Tardis" from Doctor Who. No problem there. But we ended up having to redo a significant portion of it later, and someone had the bright idea of changing the redo codename to "ReTardis". It was hilariously juvenile at the time, but I could see how, decades later as society gotten less tolerant of that kind of humor, the codename probably has become objectionable.
striking|2 months ago
philwelch|2 months ago
AtheistOfFail|2 months ago
How? Logically I don't get it.
silisili|2 months ago
hdjrudni|2 months ago
(I'm genuinely confused by the "How?" question)
tomjakubowski|2 months ago
jpollock|2 months ago
unknown|2 months ago
[deleted]
khannn|2 months ago