(no title)
hyc_symas | 2 months ago
Other treatments may eventually prove to have too many serious negative side effects. That's a good reason to abandon them.
hyc_symas | 2 months ago
Other treatments may eventually prove to have too many serious negative side effects. That's a good reason to abandon them.
Aurornis|2 months ago
This isn’t really an obstacle, at least not as much as it’s made out to be.
There are numerous examples of drugs being brought to market at high prices despite having been generic compounds. Even old drugs can be brought back at $1000/month or more at different doses or delivery mechanisms.
One example: Doxepin is an old antidepressant that is extremely cheap. It was recently re-certified for sleep at lower doses and reintroduced at low doses at a much higher price, despite being “off patent”.
This happens all the time. The drug companies aren’t actually abandoning usable treatments due to patent issues as much as journalists have claimed. If they couldn’t, for some reason, find a way to charge for it they could still use it as a basis for finding an improved relayed compound with more targeted effects, better pharmacokinetics, etc.
They’re not just dropping promising treatments anywhere if there’s a market for them.
DivingForGold|2 months ago
megaman821|2 months ago
cluckindan|2 months ago
justinclift|2 months ago
ikawe|2 months ago
IIRC it was more about production methods than developing new treatments.
https://fourthievesvinegar.org/
vibrio|2 months ago
dboreham|2 months ago