[nunodonato]

I'm gonna call bs on these kind of comments. "better" on what? Coding models shouldn't even be compared isolated. A big part of making it work in a real/big codebase is the tool that calls the model (claude code, gemini-cli, etc). I'll bet claude code will still keep stealing your lunch every day of the week against any competitor out there

[koakuma-chan]

I haven't used CC in a few months, what killer features have they added? I am using Cursor, it's clunky, but not that clunky so as to completely destroy model performance. I am pretty sure for my tasks (undocumented, buggy, legacy JavaScript project) GPT-5.2 is > all on any decent harness, because it doesn't give up or half-ass. It can run for 5 minutes or for 50 minutes, depending on your request.

[dkdcio]

lol bold claim initially for not using the primary competitor in months. I try to use all 3 (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI); there are tradeoffs between all 3

[nunodonato]

it's not about features (although they've added plenty), its the internal tooling and the way the model is prompted.

[nunodonato]

we dont have capability to see the inner working of claude code, its not open source. You just use it and you see the difference. I've tried all of them, including anti-gravity. Nothing beats claude code

[Mkengin]

According to SWE-Rebench Anthropic and OpenAI are really close in performance, while GPT-5.2 costs less than half the cost of CC per problem.

https://swe-rebench.com/