(no title)
zeta0134 | 2 months ago
Yes the end result is at some small moment in time a thing that was built. But the value prop of the company isn't the software, it's the ability to solve business problems. The software is a means to that end. Understanding the problems is almost the entire job.
davidbau|2 months ago
Is it possible to vibe code (the second way, without looking at 90% of the code) and still learn the important things?
I think the keys to the castle will come from figuring out how to do this.
orjfi2hsbfith|2 months ago
Clearly it's critical to the job, but to take your point to its limits: imagine the business has a problem to solve and you say "I have learned how to solve it but I won't solve it nor help anyone with it." Your employer would not celebrate this, because they don't pay you for the private inner workings of your own mind, they pay you for the effects your mind has on their product. Learning is a means to an end here, not the end itself.
zeta0134|2 months ago
Here, of course, is finally where AI can plausibly enter the picture. It's pretty good at search! So if someone has learned, and understood, and written it down, that documentation can be consumed, surfaced, and learned by a new hire. But if the new hire doesn't actually learn from that, then they can't improve it with their own understanding. That's the danger.
ModernMech|2 months ago
Intrinsic in learning is teaching. You haven't learned something until you've successfully taught it to someone else.