top | item 46327667

(no title)

Implicated | 2 months ago

> but for entirely non-technical reasons we had to exclude it

Able/willing to expand on this at all? Just curious.

discuss

order

misnome|2 months ago

They seem to have gone all-in on AI, for commits and ticket management. Not interested in interacting with that.

Otherwise, the built in admin on one-executable was nice, and support for tiered storage, but single node parallel write performance was pretty unimpressive and started throwing strange errors (investigating of which led to the AI ticket discovery).

NitpickLawyer|2 months ago

Not the same person you asked, but my guess would be that it is seen as a chinese product.

lima|2 months ago

RustFS appears to be very early-stage with no real distributed systems architecture: https://github.com/rustfs/rustfs/pull/884

I'm not sure if it even has any sort of cluster consensus algorithm? I can't imagine it not eating committed writes in a multi-node deployment.

Garage and Ceph (well, radosgw) are the only open source S3-compatible object storage which have undergone serious durability/correctness testing. Anything else will most likely eat your data.

dewey|2 months ago

What is this based on, honest question as from the landing page I don't get that impression. Are many committers China-based?