[piyuv]

Fortunately, GenAI will never be as good as human artists.

[beering]

That may be true, but you can’t compare average GenAI with the best humans because there are many reasons the human output is low quality: budget, timelines, oversights, not having the best artists, etc. Very few games use the best human artists for everything.

Same with programming. The best humans write better code than Codex, but the awful government portals and enterprise apps you’re using today were also written by humans.

[johnnyanmac]

He didn't say "best humans". he said "humans".

And yes, I think with the current trajectory, we're not even hitting "crappy entrprise government portal" levels within the next few decades.

[viraptor]

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09567976231207095

> AI Hyperrealism: Why AI Faces Are Perceived as More Real Than Human Ones (Nov 2023)

[KK7NIL]

"Fortunately, machines will never be as good as human chess players."

[hackable_sand]

This holds true

[happytoexplain]

Subjective vs objective. Also, analogies are almost always weak rhetorical distractions. The conversation just becomes about the differences between the two things. If you want to state an opinion about X, form the thought about X, rather than just pointing to Y and asserting they're the same.