top | item 46333309

(no title)

chrislusf | 2 months ago

Disclaim: I work on SeaweedFS.

Why skipping SeaweedFS? It rank #1 on all benchmarks, and has a lot of features.

discuss

I confirm this, I used SeaweedFS to serve 1M users daily with 56 million images / ~100TB with 2 servers + HDD only, while Minio can't do this. Seaweedfs performance is much better than Minio's. The only problem is that SeaweedFS documentation is hard to understand.

magicalhippo|2 months ago

SeaweedFS is also so optimized for small objects, it can't store larger objects (max 32GiB[1]).

Not a concern for many use-cases, just something to be aware of as it's not a universal solution.

[1]: https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs?tab=readme-ov-file#st...

ted_dunning|2 months ago

SeaweedFS is very nice and takes quite an effort to lose data.

dionian|2 months ago

can you link benchmarks

chrislusf|2 months ago

It is in the parent comment.