(no title)
cdfuller | 2 months ago
Being unfamiliar with it, it's hard to tell if this is a minor blip that happens all the time, or if it's potentially a major issue that could cause cascading errors equal to the hype of Y2K.
cdfuller | 2 months ago
Being unfamiliar with it, it's hard to tell if this is a minor blip that happens all the time, or if it's potentially a major issue that could cause cascading errors equal to the hype of Y2K.
autarch|2 months ago
fuzztester|2 months ago
And most enterprises, including banks, use databases.
So by bad luck, you may get a couple of transactions reversed in order of time, such as a $20 debit incorrectly happening before a $10 credit, when your bank balance was only $10 prior to both those transactions. So your balance temporarily goes negative.
Now imagine if all those amounts were ten thousand times higher ...
verzali|2 months ago
philistine|2 months ago
jeffrallen|2 months ago
Asking for a friend.
yawpitch|2 months ago
Animats|2 months ago
The main problem will be services that assume at least one of the NIST time servers is up. Somewhere, there's going to be something that won't work right when all the NIST NTP servers are down. But what?
guenthert|2 months ago
If you have information on what they actually are using internally, please share.
genidoi|2 months ago
axlee|2 months ago
adastra22|2 months ago
dredmorbius|2 months ago
jhart99|2 months ago
joncrane|2 months ago
franklyworks|2 months ago
estimator7292|2 months ago
The network will route around the damage with no real effects. Maybe a few microseconds of jitter as you have to ask a more distant server for the time.
unknown|2 months ago
[deleted]
1970-01-01|2 months ago
The answer is no. Anyone claiming this will have an impact on infrastructure has no evidence backing it up. Table top exercises at best.
ThrowawayTestr|2 months ago
Roark66|2 months ago
ncr100|2 months ago
Perhaps, "We don't know." will become popular?
meindnoch|2 months ago
__turbobrew__|2 months ago
cramcgrab|2 months ago