top | item 46346011

(no title)

tanaros | 2 months ago

> The purpose of a federal government should be to grant rights, not restrictions.

If the federal government is about granting rights, does that imply the default state is “no rights”? That seems objectively worse.

discuss

order

OutOfHere|2 months ago

Individual states tend to take away rights. In the aforesaid approach, it's the job of the federal government to ensure they can't or don't.