[jedimastert]

> Starlink-style connectivity

Note that one of the higher-profile deliberate internet shutdowns was Starlink itself shutting down internet connectivity in Ukraine.

[ursAxZA]

Ultimately it just becomes a question of where you want the choke point to live — in a state actor, or in a private operator.

Neither option is risk-free; the failure modes simply differ.

A government can shut you off for political reasons, a corporation can shut you off for contractual or geopolitical ones.

As long as the system assumes centralized stewardship for safety or reliability, someone will inevitably hold the switch — the only variable is who.

[dylan604]

> in a state actor, or in a private operator.

multiple satellite operators are coming on line. what are the odds all of them coordinate to shut down in one region invalidating using the other providers as fail over?

[onethumb]

Is that true? This comment suggests otherwise, with citations. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46351511

[jedimastert]

That particular section I have to Wikipedia article seems to have gone through a bunch of anonymous edits back and forth around the content of this citation

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/sep/07/elon-musk...

[try_the_bass]

Notably absent from TFA...

Probably because it's not actually a truthful characterization of what happened! I know it's popular to find every possible reason to bag on Musk, but you don't need to resort to disinformation to do it.

[tenuousemphasis]

Are you trying to argue that Starlink isn't cut off Ukrainian access? Because they did and it was well documented.