top | item 46353064 (no title) jeroen | 2 months ago If we actually (as the title seems to imply) invert the parentheses, then for your example we get 1+2)*(3 .Now all you need are the opening and closing parentheses at the start and end, and we're back to normal. discuss order hn newest sunir|2 months ago Thank you. I thought I was going crazy reading the article which doesn’t connect open and close parenthesis :: higher and lower precedence :: indent and outdent :: +1 and -1 and just flip it around to get the opposing polarity.A real Wesley Crusher moment. swiftcoder|2 months ago Yeah, that seems a much more robust formulation of the whole thing. Flip all parens and enclose the whole string in more parens. chrisweekly|2 months ago that results in (1+2)*(3) which is (as GP notes), equivalent to "normal", ie what we do today: (1+2)*3 Right?
sunir|2 months ago Thank you. I thought I was going crazy reading the article which doesn’t connect open and close parenthesis :: higher and lower precedence :: indent and outdent :: +1 and -1 and just flip it around to get the opposing polarity.A real Wesley Crusher moment.
swiftcoder|2 months ago Yeah, that seems a much more robust formulation of the whole thing. Flip all parens and enclose the whole string in more parens. chrisweekly|2 months ago that results in (1+2)*(3) which is (as GP notes), equivalent to "normal", ie what we do today: (1+2)*3 Right?
chrisweekly|2 months ago that results in (1+2)*(3) which is (as GP notes), equivalent to "normal", ie what we do today: (1+2)*3 Right?
sunir|2 months ago
A real Wesley Crusher moment.
swiftcoder|2 months ago
chrisweekly|2 months ago