[ursAxZA]

I prefer “rare” to “well-done” — in steak, and in life.

Algorithms tend to optimize us toward well-being as “well-done”: predictable, consistent, uniformly cooked. Safe, measurable, repeatable.

But human experience is closer to “rare”: uneven, risky, asymmetric, and still alive. The parts that matter most are often the ones that don’t fit cleanly into metrics.

If everything becomes optimized, nothing remains interesting. And more importantly, we risk replacing well-being with the monitoring of well-being.

When a life is constantly optimized, scored, nudged, and corrected, it gradually stops being a life that is actually experienced.

[purple_basilisk]

Thank you for this deeply revealing take. I think this is the dynamic at the core of what matters here. Reminds me of Dostoevsky's take on what people really want - here's an interesting short piece that direction.

https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/freedom/these-are-barbarous...

[ursAxZA]

Thanks for sharing this.

It made me wonder where a future goes when it keeps trying to define both barbarism and normalcy.

As a small tribute in return, three films came to mind:

Bicentennial Man,

Gattaca,

Fight Club.

I’ve always preferred Ivan the Fool — choosing to live, rather than living inside a definition.