[zarp]

> it seems pretty random as to when it decides to drop that out of context

Overcoming this kind of nondeterministic behavior around creating/following/modifying instructions is the biggest thing I wish I could solve with my LLM workflows. It seems like you might be able to do this through a system of Claude Code hooks, but I've struggled with finding a good UX for maintaining a growing and ever-changing collection of hooks.

Are there any tools or harnesses that attempt to address this and allow you to "force" inject dynamic rules as context?

[lkjdsklf]

Wouldn't it be great if we had some kind of deterministic language to precisely and concisely tell a computer what to do

[oblio]

Yeah, but that's hard and boring.

[chairmansteve]

Like Java or Python?