[bluehex]

Anyone who's done some vibe coding can imagine what a mess a vibe coded operating system is going to be with current day tools. LLM agent coding is good at making small prototype web apps and the like but trying to apply it to significantly complex legacy software is a nightmare.

[camdenreslink]

I'm not sure I'd feel comfortable making large changes to a complex legacy code base with just an LLM. But I think an LLM could be a big help to try to understand a complex legacy code base. As long as you are verifying what it is saying (which you would naturally kind of have to for that use case).

[bluehex]

I absolutely agree with you. I think this quote in the article gave me the impression that they are talking more about vibe coding it at scale rather than llm assisted engineering.

  "Our strategy is to combine AI and Algorithms to rewrite Microsoft’s largest codebases. Our North Star is ‘1 engineer, 1 month, 1 million lines of code.’"

[Grimblewald]

I think, given the level of jank we see in W11, we are already feeling the effects of vibe coded OS stuff. Sure right now it's surface layer stuff that mostly breaks things like your start menu or file explorer, you know, basic stuff no one will notice, once you bring this digital cancer into the OS's core functionality all hell will break loose.