[rwaksmunski]

It's decent at explaining my code back to me, so I can make sure my intent is visible within code/comments/tracing messages. Not too bad at writing test cases either. I still write my code.

[zingar]

Are you saying that you literally write the features by yourself and that you only use LLMs to understand old code and write tests?

Or a more meta point that “LLMs are capable of a lot”?

[rwaksmunski]

I'm saying it's not good enough to write code yet, but good at explaining code. If it can't that means I messed up and I need to make it clearer. Once it's explanation and my meaning line up, the code is good enough and I move on. Meta point is that people are using AI for the wrong thing. It's great at consuming, not creating.