[nishilpatel]

The LIBR logic is straightforward, but OCR quality, auditability, and evidence integrity are what make this usable in the real world.

lawyers care about chain of custody, auditability, and immutability makes this less of an “AI app” and more of a compliance workflow tool, which might matter a lot for positioning.

On B2C vs B2B: individuals feel this once, lawyers feel it every case — which usually determines who actually pays.

The biggest risk seems less about accuracy and more about how courts classify the output (calculator vs expert opinion). That likely drives both liability and pricing.

Have you run this past a practicing family lawyer or forensic accountant yet, even informally?

[cd_mkdir]

OP here – thanks for the feedback. I just pushed an update to address the Chain of Custody concerns.

The system now generates immutable forensic reports with SHA-256 integrity hashes for every document. Also added a regression suite to verify the tracing algorithm against known edge cases. The focus is definitely shifting from just "AI wrapper" to "Audit Compliance tool.

Case: https://exitprotocols.com/static/documents/Sterling_Forensic...