top | item 46383930

(no title)

J-Kuhn | 2 months ago

The compiled binary is.

The source code is... AGPL licensed? But not the admin tools. They seem to be licensed under the Apache License 2.0.

--------

Yeah, good luck. Contact your lawyer.

discuss

AGPL and Apache are both open source licenses. So I’m not getting what the confusion would be as an end user, who won’t be modifying the software or packaging it for sale.

ekjhgkejhgk|2 months ago

They're both FREE software licenses, which is more.

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html

dns_snek|2 months ago

> Yeah, good luck. Contact your lawyer.

Why? The intent seems pretty clear and they're legally allowed to do this because all contributors signed a CLA.

bfkwlfkjf|2 months ago

Explain please. This interests me and I'm extremely curious about what you mean.

J-Kuhn|2 months ago

Combining source code under different licenses into one product is a nightmare.

You have to follow the AGPL "no additional restrictions" clause while also following the Apache License, and the Apache License might have require you to follow additional restrictions.