top | item 46414325

(no title)

kcb | 2 months ago

The US navy is in freefall. The best we can do is build a 40 year old destroyer hull and an aircraft carrier class that we plan to be building for literally 100 years. Shipyards can't build anything. Every design is mismanaged so poorly and leached on by traitorous defense contractors so badly that we get essentially nothing but the bill.

discuss

order

JumpCrisscross|2 months ago

> best we can do

Why would you take this as an indication of the “best we can do”?

mpyne|2 months ago

I think they pretty clearly meant 'practical best' rather than 'theoretical best'. Theoretically we could be so much better, which is why everyone is so grumpy about U.S. shipbuilding.

For 'practical best' you'd normally point people to examples of warships the U.S. actually can build without much drama, but if you try this with the Navy you're basically left with, what, the last LPD class?

10 years ago you'd call the Virginia SSNs a success, but even those have now run into construction delays due to various issues, even as the Navy needs their #1 priority (Columbia-class SSBN, also delayed) to succeed to decommission the Ohios on time.

jasonwatkinspdx|2 months ago

Because US Navy procurement has been a disaster for over two decades now?

Just Zumwalt and LCS alone are like $50 billion burned up for nothing.

The Navy's issues with procurement go all the way back to the retiring of the Oliver Hazard Perry class without a suitable replacement in the pipeline.

Bratmon|2 months ago

Because there's no secret group of competent people waiting in the wings.

The military-industrial complex we have is the only one we got.

jjk166|2 months ago

One project becoming a boondoggle is evidence we're not living up to our potential. Every project becoming a boondoggle is evidence we are.

kcb|2 months ago

I'm not saying its the best we should do. But its the best we are capable of doing.

russdill|2 months ago

Hulls last a really long time and the relevance of a large navy has changed. Keeping existing hulls up to date seems like a much better use of funds, no?