[enether]

I didn't use AI in writing the post.

I did some research with it, and used it to help create the ASCII art a bit. That's about it.

I was afraid that adding the emoji would trigger someone to think it's AI.

In any case, nowadays I basically always get at least one comment calling me an AI on a post that's relatively popular. I assume it's more a sign of the times than the writing...

[tuetuopay]

Thank you for the clarification! I'm sorry for engaging in the LLM hunt, I don't usually do. Please keep writing, this was a really good breakdown!

In hindsight, I would not even have thought about it if not for the comment I replied to. LLM prose fail to make me read whole paragraphs and I find myself skipping roughly the second half of every paragraph, which was definitely not the case for your article. I did somewhat skip at the emoji heading, not because of LLMs, but because of a saturation of emojis in some contexts that don't really need them.

I should have written "this could be LLM assisted" instead of "this more feels like LLM assisted", but well words.

Again, sorry, don't get discouraged by the LLM witch hunt.

[macintux]

I’m about ready to start flagging every comment that complains about the source material being LLM-generated. It’s tiresome, pointless, and adds absolutely nothing useful to the discussion.

If the material is wrong, explain why. Otherwise, shut up.