(no title)
noworld | 2 months ago
May 15, 1987: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00789R0017000...
May 17, 1987: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Stark_incident
noworld | 2 months ago
May 15, 1987: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00789R0017000...
May 17, 1987: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Stark_incident
ZYbCRq22HbJ2y7|2 months ago
Also, what guarantee is there that whomever created that document didn't just date it two days prior to acquire more funding for doing spooky things?
noworld|2 months ago
FuturisticLover|2 months ago
Reality is indeed stranger than fiction.
anthk|2 months ago
More info:
http://shpenkov.com/pdf/microleptonsEng.pdf
Odd patent:
https://patents.google.com/patent/RU99109282A/en
I don't understand this at all.
It's like trying to understand QM before Maxwell.
This is even more surreal:
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/a-phenomenological-model-o...
perfmode|2 months ago
namanyayg|2 months ago
(And does it remind anyone else of an ee cummings poem or is it just me)
noworld|2 months ago
For example:
1. The drawing on p. 7 looks like the superstructure of a warship.
2. The next few pages might describe what it feels like to wonder if your ship is actually under missile attack.
3. On page 10 it records "aircraft--large, multiengined; distant; orbiting; distraction controlled, directed. 'Under orders.'" This USNI article has a little more detail on the AWACS plane detecting the incoming attack: https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2017/j...
There are other similarities, but the CIA report predates the attack, which is especially strange.
finalarbiter|2 months ago