top | item 46423487

(no title)

jack_riminton | 2 months ago

Electrek’s ‘reporting’ has proven so one-sided that I take all their stories with a bucket of salt. Even if the truck has been a flop I doubt their whole battery program has been. Perhaps they’re rejigging suppliers and pausing whilst they get ready to ramp up cyber cab production lines

discuss

order

youarentrightjr|2 months ago

> get ready to ramp up cyber cab production lines

The word on the street is this is only 2 weeks out.

Right after fulfilling the roadster orders.

And right before the Dyson sphere that will power Grok AI is deployed.

Loughla|2 months ago

If we build a Dyson sphere just to power chat bots, I'm turning into an eco-terrorist.

malfist|2 months ago

And what evidence do you base those assumptions on? According to the journalists at electrek despite Tesla having capacity to manufacture 250k cybertrucks per year, they're only selling 20-25k per year

SonOfKyuss|2 months ago

I actually get a kick out of Eletrek’s roasting of Elon and Tesla, but if you read a few of their articles, it’s clear they don’t like him. Lots of opinions and editorializing in the articles. I have no problem with that, you just have to realize where they are coming from and base your interpretation accordingly

mxschumacher|2 months ago

and SpaceX has been a major buyer of Cybertrucks

narrator|2 months ago

The haters on here are ridiculous. If everyone who ever had a product that failed in the market was called a fraud on HN then probably almost everyone would be. SpaceX failed on their first three launches. All the haters here would have voted to shut it all down. Glad Elon's able to recover from business failures without going to the HN comments section to find out what he should do next.

_ea1k|2 months ago

Yeah, I'm getting the same feeling. They've announced that semi will use 4680 and Cyber Cab as well, right? If that's the case, this would point to a specific supplier issue rather than something more general.

It isn't something that I've looked into in depth, but it feels like a lot of the discussion isn't hitting the mark here.

epistasis|2 months ago

When somebody is siding with reality, especially a media source, that's a reason to listen to them more not less.

And when it's straight up facts easily verifiable from others sources, pretending that it's not based in reality is just sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming "la la la la" which is something that even very few 12 year olds do.

DustinBrett|2 months ago

The only fact was about the contract which is like a sentence of the article. Then it goes into a guessing game on what it could mean, with the most negative spin possible.

mikeryan|2 months ago

I honestly don’t follow this much but I doubt that production ramp up is the Cybercab’s long pole when they’ll need a significant number of market approvals for FSD to reach critical mass.

postexitus|2 months ago

Let's stay positive folks! /s

nutjob2|2 months ago

[deleted]

dzhiurgis|2 months ago

[deleted]