[banbangtuth]

You know what. After seeing all these articles about AI/LLM for these past 4 years, about how they are going to replace me as software developers and about how I am not productive enough without using 5 agents and being a project manager.

I. Don't. Care.

I don't even care about those debates outside. Debates about do LLM work and replace programmers? Say they do, ok so what?

I simply have too much fun programming. I am just a mere fullstack business line programmer, generic random replaceable dude, you can find me dime a dozen.

I do use LLM as Stack Overflow/docs replacement, but I always code by hand all my code.

If you want to replace me, replace me. I'll go to companies that need me. If there are no companies that need my skill, fine, then I'll just do this as a hobby, and probably flip burgers outside to make a living.

I don't care about your LLM, I don't care about your agent, I probably don't even care about the job prospects for that matter if I have to be forced to use tools that I don't like and to use workflows I don't like. You can go ahead find others who are willing to do it for you.

As for me, I simply have too much fun programming. Now if you excuse me, I need to go have fun.

[lifetimerubyist]

Hear hear. I didn't spend half my life getting an education, competing in the corporate crab bucket, retraining and upskilling just to turn into a robot babysitter.

[danielbln]

Then continue to write code as a hobby, noone is going to take that away from you. But if you want someone to pay you for hand setting code the way you always have then .. well you might find that harder and harder as time goes on.

[yacthing]

Easy to say if you either:

(1) already have enough money to survive without working, or

(2) don't realize how hard of a life it would be to "flip burgers" to make a living in 2026.

We live very good lives as software developers. Don't be a fool and think you could just "flip burgers" and be fine.

[banbangtuth]

Ah, I actually did flip burgers. So I know.

I also did dry cleaning, cleaning service, deli, delivery guy, etc.

Yup I now have enough money to survive without working.

But I also am very low maintenance, thanks to my early life being raised in harsh conditions.

I am not scared to go back flipping burgers again.

[hecanjog]

I appreciate this perspective. I'm actually hoping LLM hype will help to pop the bubble of tech salaries, make the profession roughly as profitable as going into teaching, so maybe the gold diggers will clear out and go play the stock market or something, rest of us can stick around and build things. Maybe software quality will even improve as a result? Would be nice...

[falkensmaize]

Man, come on - what planet are you from, seriously? I got into this business because I enjoy programming, but I also wanted to for once in my life make a decent living and be able to save something. I have kids I'd like to send to college. I'd like to be able to retire someday. I have aging parents that need expensive care. This is one of the few professions that you can upskill into without years of expensive degrees.

People need to make money to survive, now more than ever. It seems incredibly selfish to wish for that to disappear just so you can "purify" the profession.

[dinkumthinkum]

I hear you but I feel like you (and really others like you, in mass) should not be so passive about your replacement. For most programmers, simply flipping burgers for money to enjoy programming a few hours a week is not going to work. Making a living is a thing. If you are reduced to having to flip burgers that means the economy will gave collapsed and there won’t be any magic Elon UBI money to save us.

[banbangtuth]

We will have bigger problems when that happens. I am not worried.

[llmslave2]

I simply will not spend my life begging and coaxing a machine to output working code. If that is what becomes of this profession, I will just do something else :)

[ryanobjc]

If I wanted to do that, I'd just move into engineering management and work with something less temperamental and predictable - humans.

I'd at least be more likely to get a boost in impact and ability to affect decision making, maybe.

[aspenmartin]

It would definitely be the profession if we stopped developing things today. Think about the idea of coding agents 2 years ago, I personally found them very unrealistic and am now coding exclusively with them despite them being either a neutral or net negative to my development time simply because I see the writing on the wall that in 6 mos to a year they will probably be a huge net positive and in 2-3 years the dismissive attitude towards adoption will start to look kind of silly (no offense). To me we are _just_ at the inflection point where using and not using coding agents are both totally sensible decisions.

[agentifysh]

having fun isn't tied to employment unless you are self-employed even then what's fun should not be the driving force

[lifetimerubyist]

"get a job doing something you enjoy and you'll never work a day in your life"

or something like that

[banbangtuth]

Why? It is a matter of values. Fun can be a driving force just like money and stability is. It is simply a matter of your values (and your sacrifices).

Like I said, I am just a generic replaceable dime a dozen programmer dude.

[throw-12-16]

i think you angered the hustle bros

[llmslave2]

That sounds miserable to me :(