(no title)
Zaskoda | 2 months ago
Unlike AI, there's a strong incentive to find the cheapest electricity possible. Because that's what everyone else is doing. With Bitcoin, you now exactly what your costs are and what your yields are. There's a clear threshold, when power in an area becomes too expensive there's no reason left to mine.
AI, on the other hand, is a bet on the future - infinite gains. No matter how much power costs, it's worth it to keep using as much as possible. We can't know how much power AI uses. Unlike Bitcoin, there aren't any metrics from which to extrapolate. But we do know that AI uses more power than Bitcoin already. We just have no idea how much more.
bb88|2 months ago
I call shenanigans on this statement. We can and most certainly can tell how much power AI is using. The upper bound is the total datacenter usage.
Zaskoda|1 month ago
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/apr/24/elon-musk...
We have no idea what's happening in private data centers around the world.
utopiah|2 months ago
cyberax|2 months ago
WTF? Hydro is rarely wasted because it's so dispatchable. Typically, it can only happen during high water seasons. Same for the gas power plants.
> Unlike AI, there's a strong incentive to find the cheapest electricity possible.
Like coal.
beenBoutIT|2 months ago
fragmede|2 months ago
Funny thing about that. Civilized governments put a stop to that, by fining flare-offs to make it economical to not do that.
krupan|2 months ago
nativeit|2 months ago
UltraSane|2 months ago
zoklet-enjoyer|2 months ago
oofbey|2 months ago
beenBoutIT|2 months ago
johnnienaked|2 months ago
Cmon you remember supply and demand right