top | item 46452583 (no title) steeve | 2 months ago nobody cares about the website being done with AI because the code of the project itself is not AIyou need to touch grass discuss order hn newest girvo|2 months ago The code of the project absolutely does look like it was done with AI lol, it’s a single commit… jbaptiste|2 months ago Claude did rewrote lots of my original messy code. No shame in that? But in the end the interest was in the underlying architecture, applied to nats protocol. Anyway. load replies (1) throw-qqqqq|2 months ago Dude, when I move projects to GitHub I also often collapse everything into a single commit.I do this to avoid having to check e-mail addresses and names in commits - maybe I mistakenly made a commit from my work account etc.After the “initial” commit making it all public, I start to work “in the open”. I see many others doing it the same way.That is NOT a reliable indicator of slop! load replies (3) steeve|2 months ago [deleted] load replies (2)
girvo|2 months ago The code of the project absolutely does look like it was done with AI lol, it’s a single commit… jbaptiste|2 months ago Claude did rewrote lots of my original messy code. No shame in that? But in the end the interest was in the underlying architecture, applied to nats protocol. Anyway. load replies (1) throw-qqqqq|2 months ago Dude, when I move projects to GitHub I also often collapse everything into a single commit.I do this to avoid having to check e-mail addresses and names in commits - maybe I mistakenly made a commit from my work account etc.After the “initial” commit making it all public, I start to work “in the open”. I see many others doing it the same way.That is NOT a reliable indicator of slop! load replies (3) steeve|2 months ago [deleted] load replies (2)
jbaptiste|2 months ago Claude did rewrote lots of my original messy code. No shame in that? But in the end the interest was in the underlying architecture, applied to nats protocol. Anyway. load replies (1)
throw-qqqqq|2 months ago Dude, when I move projects to GitHub I also often collapse everything into a single commit.I do this to avoid having to check e-mail addresses and names in commits - maybe I mistakenly made a commit from my work account etc.After the “initial” commit making it all public, I start to work “in the open”. I see many others doing it the same way.That is NOT a reliable indicator of slop! load replies (3)
girvo|2 months ago
jbaptiste|2 months ago
throw-qqqqq|2 months ago
I do this to avoid having to check e-mail addresses and names in commits - maybe I mistakenly made a commit from my work account etc.
After the “initial” commit making it all public, I start to work “in the open”. I see many others doing it the same way.
That is NOT a reliable indicator of slop!
steeve|2 months ago
[deleted]