[oldsj]

I like the idea. As a solo dev I've experimented with creating Claude subagents for multiple perspectives for "team leads" and will run ideas through them (in parallel). The subagents are just simple markdown explaining the various perspectives that are usually in contention when designing stuff. And a 'decider' that gives me an executive summary.

  agents/
    |-- customer-expert.md - validates problem assumptions, customer reality
    |-- design-lead.md - shapes solution concepts, ensures UX quality
    |-- growth-expert.md - competitive landscape, positioning, distribution
    |-- technical-expert.md - assesses feasibility, identifies technical risks
    |-- decider-advisor.md - synthesizes perspectives, executive analysis

[bisonbear]

I've experimented with something similar - my flow is to have the subagents "initialize" a persona for the task at hand, and then have the main thread simulate a debate between the personas. Not sure if it's the best approach but it's helpful to get a diversity of perspectives on an issue

[nprateem]

s/validates/guesses/

Ftfy. You might as well toss a coin.

[oldsj]

I think we’re slightly better than random at this point