[brokensegue]

this isn't a peer reviewed journal article though. do you have expertise in the field to say whether an expert would be able to decipher this?

[smallnix]

I know experts who deciphered this. But I will not tell you their names.

[SirSavary]

The book is written in Latin, not exactly a dead language.

[brokensegue]

That isn't what the claim is about. I mean I don't think the source is particularly convincing but the claim is that it figured out the significance of the text not the literal meaning of the words

[why-o-why]

I don't think you understand the word "knowledge". Just because an LLM spews out an answer doesn't mean it is correct. It needs to be verified by experts in the field, that's how it becomes factual knowledge. Lord help us that I need to explain this.

[brokensegue]

I don't think this particular discussion has to do with the idea of knowledge. We're discussing whether human experts had previously deciphered the sections