(no title)
karlshea | 1 month ago
All of it seemed way too annoying compared to just having a dotfiles repo, and if it couldn’t handle the Tower/gitconfig issue I know for sure everything else I was going to run into wasn’t worth it.
karlshea | 1 month ago
All of it seemed way too annoying compared to just having a dotfiles repo, and if it couldn’t handle the Tower/gitconfig issue I know for sure everything else I was going to run into wasn’t worth it.
jorvi|1 month ago
The way I do it is have config files in my Nix config folder, then use Nix to symlink them and I use git to make me aware of state changes, that I might want to make reproducible. But that's just me being used to my old git ways, using 'nh' gives much more clarity.
The "true" Nix way is putting the entire contents of whatever config file in a .nix file, then erasing the original config and have Nix recreate the config (preferably read-only) in place. You become truly reproducible but for obvious reasons applications get mad when you make their config file read only.