(no title)
Drybones | 1 month ago
Disliking Google Chrome proper is one thing, but Chromium is superior in every way. Rendering, features, speed, memory management
Drybones | 1 month ago
Disliking Google Chrome proper is one thing, but Chromium is superior in every way. Rendering, features, speed, memory management
foresto|1 month ago
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786909
BloodyIron|1 month ago
lelanthran|1 month ago
Being faster, prettier and using less memory[1] is pointless if the browser won't let me block all ads.
I mean, it's like comparing a turd sandwich made with expensive exotic bread, and a cheese sandwich made with cheap grocery store break.
Sure, the one has great exotic bread, but I don't want the turd it comes with.
So, yeah, it actually doesn't matter how much prettier, faster or smaller web pages are with Chrome, at least FF lets me (currently) block almost anything.
---------------------------------------
[1] Chrome beats out FF in exactly one of those, and it's not the memory or speed. Turns out ads take up a lot of RAM, and slow down pages considerably.
pseidemann|1 month ago
drtgh|1 month ago
savolai|1 month ago
Please elaborate on ”features”.
Does chromium have non-google sync?
Drybones|1 month ago
But I am talking about browser feature support, not stuff that can supplemented with an extension like a password manager.
Firefox has poor support for modern web features including video processing and encoding which makes it very bad at web conferencing/video calls or in-page streaming.
Firefox's developer tools and console is also much worse and missing important features.
Other features Firefox is missing or has poor support for compared to Chromium are WebGPU, WebTransport, Periodic Background Sync, and parts of WebRTC. Plus various APIs for web serial, badging, and Web Share are missing partial or full support.
Firefox still doesn't have functional HDR for images and videos including AV1.