top | item 46472811 (no title) GenerocUsername | 1 month ago Cmon man, it's a comment not a research paper. Off by one isn't worth a follow up snark discuss order hn newest cwnyth|1 month ago Off by 10+1. Someone who graduated college in 2000 = 25 + 22 (4 years of college from 18) = 47, not 57, and not anywhere close to the retirement age. It might be pedantry, but the original comment should have said 1990, not 2000. sokoloff|1 month ago Their main point was it is off by 10; then they introduced an additional confusing question of “is it off by 10, 11, or 12?” unknown|1 month ago [deleted]
cwnyth|1 month ago Off by 10+1. Someone who graduated college in 2000 = 25 + 22 (4 years of college from 18) = 47, not 57, and not anywhere close to the retirement age. It might be pedantry, but the original comment should have said 1990, not 2000.
sokoloff|1 month ago Their main point was it is off by 10; then they introduced an additional confusing question of “is it off by 10, 11, or 12?”
cwnyth|1 month ago
sokoloff|1 month ago
unknown|1 month ago
[deleted]