[brunooliv]

GLM-4.7 in opencode is the only opensource one that comes close in my experience and probably they did use some Claude data as I see the occasional You’re absolutely right in there

[behnamoh]

it's not even close to sonnet 4.5, let alone opus.

[hatefulmoron]

I got their z.ai plan to test alongside my Claude subscription; it feels about on par with something between sonnet 4.0 and sonnet 4.5. It's definitely a few steps below current day Claude, but it's very capable.

[brunooliv]

I agree completely, I meant in terms of opensource ones only. Opus 4.5 is the current SOTA and using it in Claude Code is an absolute amazing experience. But, paying 0 to test GLM-4.7 with opencode, feels like an amazing deal! I don’t use it for work though. But to keep “gaining experience” with these agents and tools, it’s by far the best option out there from all I’ve tried.

[kees99]

Do you see "What's your use-case" too?

Claude spits that very regularly at the end of the answer, when it's clearly out of it's depth, and wants to steer discussion away from that blind-spot.

[yodon]

Perhaps being more intentional about adding a use case to your original prompts would make sense if you see that failure mode frequently? (Practicing treating LLM failures as prompting errors tends to give the best results, even if you feel the LLM "should" have worked with the original prompt).

[moltar]

Hm, use CC daily, never seen this.

[tw1984]

never ever saw that "What's your use-case" in Claude Code.